On 2/13/2022 3:50 PM, Stef den Boer via KRnet wrote:
Everybody thanks for the documents. I have now the pages I need. I think he 
will now exept my calculations.

Stef

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Stef,

Good luck.  Not sure what you inspector is looking for but the blank document will tell him absolutely nothing about your airplane.  Max gross weight (structure designed G load) and C.G. envelope are not on the form and  he learns nothing.  If done properly he should accept your numbers if you calculate them on a plain sheet of paper.  All he should need is the C.G. range of the aircraft expressed in percent of mean cord or distance from a given datum.  This info is not on the form if that's what he is looking for.  That's in the front of the plans book and to be meaningful, that C.G. range is for the original RAF48 airfoil. I'm not aware that the range for the new airfoil was ever determined or published.  (don't even hint that to the inspector) .  The numbers for the original airfoil were used and proven to be acceptable with flight testing.  This is no different than arguing with your mother-in-law.  Tell her what she wants to hear and separate on good terms.

Larry Flesner
________________________________
-Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
-Change list delivery options at 
https://list.krnet.org/list/krnet.list.krnet.org/ Affinity List Info Board
-Search recent KRnet Archives at  
https://list.krnet.org/empathy/list/krnet.list.krnet.org/
-Search John Bouyea's decades of archive at 
https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/ 

Reply via email to