Steve,
 
Thanks for putting the history of this question into context.
 
-Jeff Scott
------------------------------------- 

Cc: "Steve G." <n92...@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: KR> Gear legs
For the sake of accurate info in the archives, here is the deal.

The conventional cut gear was the first and only type produced by Dan. 
Initially they told people they were reversible (which is probably what Larry 
was thinking). The trigear type cut didn’t come about until about 1991. There 
have been no changes after that time.

The conventional gear, when used as a trigear had a tendency to slam the nose 
down on landing The early nose struts were glass and kept breaking. This is one 
reason they changed to 4130 strut. This issue also prompted the redesign of the 
main gear leg for the trigear.

Dan was tired of explaining or arguing with people as to why the main gear leg 
for the trigear should not be reversed for a conventional taildragger so he 
just ultimately said it will work but it is not recommended.

The set back on the trigear leg in the taildragger installation makes it very 
touchy. The plane will go over on the nose much more easily when on step and 
applying brakes without a good feel for how the plane will respond. It is much 
more solid using the proper gear leg.

Nothing has ever been posted on my website to the contrary and I always 
recommend using the proper leg for the installation.

FYI, the original material blanks to cut the gear legs now cost nearly as much 
as what I sell the entire kit for.

Steve Glover

Sent from my electronic leash.
 

_______________________________________________
Search the KRnet Archives at https://www.mail-archive.com/krnet@list.krnet.org/.
Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html.
see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
options.
To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@list.krnet.org

Reply via email to