Thanks....

I have a fixed pitch 2 blade, but the idea of a 3 appeals to me given the
high rpm a vw powered kr turns, and the diameter limits that imposes
On Sep 25, 2012 6:11 AM, "Matt Elder" <mel...@mbfab.com> wrote:

> I ran the 3-blade (60") Tech-3 on my other experimental (not a KR, and
> much slower) and it worked okay, but I got a lot better climb (50%) AND
> cruise (20%) by going to their Tech-2 2 blade (68").  The larger dia was
> a better match (more efficient) for the RPM the prop was turning.  I
> will say that they are nicely built, easy to adjust, and GSC customer
> service is top notch.
>
> I can't say enough good things about them, but my gut feel is the stock
> Tech-3/2 won't be a good match for the KR application - depending on
> which envelope you want to push.  I'm pretty sure that he'll make custom
> blades though.
> I think the best thing to do is to give Rick Peter (owner) a call and
> talk to him about the application and see what he thinks. (250) 549-3772
>
> --
> Matt Elder
> MB Fabrication
>
>
> On 9/24/2012 9:03 PM, Dave Acklam wrote:
> > Their 3blade ground adjustable seems interesting...
> >
> > Any feedback?
> > _______________________________________
> > Search the KRnet Archives at http://tugantek.com/archmailv2-kr/search.
> > To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net
> > please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
>
>
>
> _______________________________________
> Search the KRnet Archives at http://tugantek.com/archmailv2-kr/search.
> To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net
> please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
>

Reply via email to