Tom Garner wrote:

> My hope is that some young bright engineer will come up with a wing design 
> to make KR2-s comply with LSA requirements. Outer wing panels of course, 
> not a total rebuild.

That's not as difficult as it sounds.  You almost don't need any math to get 
there. If you believe the stall speed numbers published for the KR2, about 
all you have to do is increase wing area by the same percentage you want to 
drop the stall speed to get under LSA requirements.  Of course your gross 
weight may be higher, so you've got to do that twice.  And if the published 
numbers are optimistic, you might build in another fudge factor.

And then there's just spending an evening doing homework by reading stuff 
like John Roncz's ""Designing Your Homebuilt" from Feb 1990 Sport Aviation 
magazine or "Sizing Your Wings", or something similar.  His spreadsheets are 
floating around on the web also, which make it even easier.  Coefficient of 
lift is given in info on one of the links from the AS504x webpage at 
http://www.krnet.org/as504x/ .   There are several variables involved in 
upsizing the wings for YOUR airplane, so rather than have somebody do the 
work for you, I'd recommend doing it yourself for your airplane.

There's a basic equation the FAA might use to give your design a "reasonable 
test" for stall speed, and all you have to do is meet that (you'll find it 
in the Roncz works).  And I'd name the airplane something other than a KR 
also, because the KR2 and KR2S already have "hard" stall speed numbers 
published by the manufacturer, so to keep from muddying the water, call it 
something else.

But the bottom line is that you could almost guess that an extra few inches 
longer than the Diehl wing would get you into LSA territory.     You just 
need to be able to whip out that calculation when the FAA guy asks for it. 
But you might want to use the 18% AS5048 airfoil to get deeper and therefore 
stronger spars in the deal.

And if the plane's already been registered as an experimental, it's too late 
to call it an LSA, although I believe it can still be flown as an LSA.  The 
other part of that is the max speed, so you'd need a small engine or a 
fine-pitched prop to keep from exceeding it.

Gotta get back to the hangar for another round with the vinyl ester fuel 
tank...

Mark Langford
N56ML "at" hiwaay.net
website at http://www.N56ML.com
--------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to