"You will probably see 250 mph with pants and 200 hp"

It doesn't work like that in the air, like adding HP to a car and expecting
speed increases. Mark's climb rate will definitely get a BIG jump, possibly
the best in the bunch so far, if he can match a prop to it. But increasing
HP does little to increase cruise or top speed after a point, especially for
planes flying at or near 200 mph and up.

Back a few months ago we discussed this at length, and all who have studied
on this have agreed; more is gained by drag reduction than HP increase. To
double the speed, drag is increased by 4 times. To get 250 mph from a KR2S,
one needs to lose the front wheel, or work very hard on a completely
aerodynamically faired leg, not just a cover, and the same holds true for
the mains, and their legs. Now anything sticking out in the breeze becomes
important; so that round strobe Mark has will have an impact at these
speeds; any antennae should have a fairing, not just be left round; wing
root fairings need special attention due to this area relating heavily to
the highest lift area on the wing so also potentially the highest drag area;
cowl flap(s) become a consideration to reduce drag; greater rake to the
vertical stab, etc...

"Speed with Economy" is definitely the bible here...

There are a lot of pluses to using the Mazda 13B in aircraft with firewalls
designed for their weight. But without alot of reinforcing, similar to the
refit rebuild that the KR360 got, I think the Mazda is too heavy, and high
output. Better to use a different engine with slightly less HP but just as
much torque after the re-drive and stay with what your firewall/airframe can
handle...

JMHO...

Colin Rainey
brokerpi...@bellsouth.net
N96TA


Reply via email to