John, I disagree.......Approaches in a crosswind should be with a wing low and the airplane lined up with the centerline. That is why so many people have trouble flying a tailwheel. They are used to crabing it in, crashing it sideways on the runway, and letting the tricycle gear straighten them up. Bobby
> Hi Bill > > Actually airspeed must be increased in a sideslip because stall speed is > raised also. This is because the wing becomes less efficient and the lift > drag ratio is reduced. This means a greater angle of attack (nearer to the > stall) at a given airspeed to maintain lift or alternatively you must > increase air speed. If side slipping an approach you should always be > applying some forward stick at the same time hence the steeper descent > angle. Flaps were invented to overcome this as you say, to give a steeper > approach angle and reduced airspeed. Side slip without forward stick has > killed many a Tiger Moth pilot since it can put you into an opposite spin > with no altitude in which to recover. Aerobatic pilots actually use this > to > advantage ti initiate spins at safe altitudes. > > Also an approach in a cross wind is a crabbed approach not necessarily a > side slip. The aircaft should still be balanced relative to the wind (ball > central) but its approach relative to the ground is skewed. In a side slip > the ball is one way or the other depending on your rudder input and this > can > be achieved without cross wind if desired. > > Cheers John. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <w-z...@sbcglobal.net> > To: "KRnet" <kr...@mylist.net> > Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 11:48 PM > Subject: Re: KR> slipping > > >> By slipping one must qualify the type. By definition you will be cross >> controlled in a forward slip, no way around that one. A side slip >> however >> would be used during a crosswind landing (kind of hard not to if you >> actually want to land on the runway). As far as slips being "dangerous" >> I >> think that it was a required skill for all of us in order to get the >> private. Remember those no flap landings. Guess what, a forward slip >> isn't >> dangerous and it provides the same advantage as flaps, steeper approach >> angle without the increased airspeed. Flaps weren't always around >> folks. >> They were added to planes like that little wheel up front on your trike >> gear >> plane to make landings easier. That is also why actually having >> tailwheel >> time is essential. Trust me if you go from the 172 world straight into >> your >> tailwheel KR you will quickly learn what the term "ground loop" means >> and >> it >> ain't an aerobatic maneuver. >> >> Bill Zink >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: <feg...@sbcglobal.net> >> To: "KRnet" <kr...@mylist.net> >> Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 1:21 AM >> Subject: KR> slipping >> >> >>> Slipping is natural when conditions require slipping. >>> However, there sometimes is a tendancy to cross control >>> which can be dangerous. >>> Not many pilots understand the tendancy to cross >>> control or even what it means. >>> Is there a CFI out there who would be generous enough >>> to elaborate on this? >>> JR >>> _______________________________________ >>> Search the KRnet Archives at http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp >>> to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net >>> please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html >>> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________ >> Search the KRnet Archives at http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp >> to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net >> please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html > > > _______________________________________ > Search the KRnet Archives at http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp > to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net > please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html >