Mike
Don't want this to sound like a flame, but that is a WAY off remark about
spin resistance.

I can tell you from personal experience that the way a Cessna is designed,
with the high wing, dihedral, off set engine, rudder behind the elevator,
etc... not only make it more spin resistant, but also make the spin
recovery a no brainer.  In the 152 or 172 you virtually have to make it
spin, and then if you do not initiate the recovery quickly, it will recover
to the point of a dive on its own.  These exercises having been done when
the plane met the criteria for use in the utility category, where spins
were allowed.  Very possibly different results would be achieved if one had
the weight/CG out of limits; but then you would not catch me flying with
that pilot either...

Conversely the Commander 112 and 114 models I am told have a bad record for
difficult if not no recovery from spins due to the tail design.  The
crusaform tail, elevator mounted half way up the vertical stab, causes lots
of problems for rudder authority during a spin.  It will get into one easy;
just do a power on stall uncoordinated to find out, but it is a BEAR to get
back out.  I called it an early day after that flight lesson...

Colin Rainey
First National Mortgage Sources
Lending Solutions in All 50 States
386-673-6814 office
407-739-0834 cell
brokerpilot9...@earthlink.net



> [Original Message]
> From: M & C <aviato...@msn.com>
> To: KRnet <kr...@mylist.net>
> Date: 1/27/2006 9:11:49 PM
> Subject: Re: KR> Spar length/spins
>
> I put my tanks in the outer wings amoung other reasons to make it
somewhat 
> more spin resistant. I would agree that it would be somewhat more
difficult 
> to recover "but not much" depending on how much rotation was allowed
before 
> recovery. Almost anything you do to an aircraft to make it more spin 
> resistent will make recovery more difficult.
>
> Mike Turner
> Jackson, Missouri
> Swing the prop and light the fire, dance amoung the stars.........N642MC
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: <jscott.pi...@juno.com>
> To: <kr...@mylist.net>
> Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 7:31 PM
> Subject: Re: KR> Spar length/spins
>
>
> >
> > On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 06:45:58 -0600 Larry&Sallie Flesner
> > <fles...@verizon.net> writes:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >Nontheless, I would be interested to know how a KR behaves in a
> >> spin
> >>
> >> >with fuel only in the outer tanks. Anyone tried it. :-)
> >> >
> >> >  John.
> >>
>
> _______________________________________
> Search the KRnet Archives at http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp
> to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net
> please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html




Reply via email to