> ----- Original Message ----- > From: Dan Heath > 65 HP on 95 pounds, fuel injected and with all accessories. Sounds too good > to be true.
Possible for the following reasons: - purpose built (the most import feature. not to many bolts) - ceramic coated combustion chamber - integrated electronic ignition and fuel injection (they call it ECU) - turbocharged - high RPMs This is not new, just designing to use the best of what's around. This excites me!!!!!!!!!!!! (and I don't even have a financial interest in the company,,,,,,, bugger) The problems I see: - not on the market yet - gon'a have to be expensive - for me, not big enough in a KR2 (maybe twin engines) :-) - is there redundancy in the ECU I look forward to more innovative engine designs as fuel prices go up, emissions levels come down and the experimental side of aviation expands. What a bright future we have to look forward to! regards Barry Kruyssen Cairns, Australia RAA 19-3873 k...@bigpond.com http://www.users.bigpond.com/kr2/kr2.htm
