IIRC There is a KR-2 based out of Brigham City to the North of SLC. And there 
is one based out of Los Alamos,NM.  Which is higher than SLC.
Bill Higdon


> I believe that there is someone else on this list in Salt Lake with a KR.  I
> live in Florida and have never seen a density altitude over 2,000', but I do
> know that my KR would still climb over 400 FPM with a 2180 VW at 10,000'.
> Others also report good high altitude climb in the KR, but I will leave it
> to people who have taken off and landed at high density altitudes to give
> you the full scoop.
> 
> The Jaibru is probably the ideal engine for a KR.  I know of nothing else in
> the size range we need that gives as much power at such a light weight.  If
> they didn't cost a fortune I and a lot of others would have one.  There are
> several KRs flying with them now.  Your next best bet on a budget is the
> Corvair.  You also might want to consider a turbo VW.  I will have one for
> sale in probably about 6 months after I get the Vair on my current KR.
> 
> KRs have very strong and long lasting airframes.  There are a bunch still
> flying that were built in the 70s.  You do see some cracks in KRs sometimes,
> but the KR does not really rely on the glass for its structure like some
> composite planes.  It is better thought of as a wood plane with a thin
> fiberglass shell.
> 
> Most of the "inherent problems" of the KR were fixed long ago.  They were
> known for folding gear and being too low to the ground, but nearly all these
> days are built with fixed gear and those problems are gone.  It is actually
> lighter weight and faster with fixed gear.  The wheelbase is also wider
> which makes it easier to handle on the ground.  The other "problem" was
> pitch sensitivity.  My opinion is that is because most people are used to
> spam cans with their inherent pitch insensitivity.  A KR goes where you
> point it and the most fun you can have on wings.  The 2S also has the tail
> much further back and that makes is much less sensitive.  The new airfoil
> also makes it more stable.  Basically, what most are building today is not
> your father's KR.
> 
> Welcome and good luck.
> 
> 
> 
> Brian Kraut
> Engineering Alternatives, Inc.
> www.engalt.com
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: krnet-bounces+brian.kraut=engalt....@mylist.net
> [mailto:krnet-bounces+brian.kraut=engalt....@mylist.net]On Behalf Of KM
> Urban
> Sent: Saturday, February 05, 2005 7:59 PM
> To: kr...@mylist.net
> Subject: KR> Newbie Questions
> 
> 
> Dear List,
> I am new to the list and I have been poking around the KR Net and have found
> answers to alot of questions so I will try to keep this short.Just as a
> point of interest, I grew up in So Cal and I used to ride my bike (as a kid)
> over to Meadowlark and I would stop by the KR factory once in awhile.I got
> to meet Ken when he was alive and he always had a minute for me. When I
> tried to buy the plans with paper route money, he told me to come by with my
> parents and he would sell plans with their blessing. Well that was the end
> of that! Here I am years down the road, and I still like the KR planes.
> My questions are: How does the plane do at high density altitudes? I live in
> the Salt Lake area, and it gets pretty hot in the summer. Has any one found
> this to be a problem? Is it realistic to use the 2S as a traveling machine
> for two people. What about a Jabaru engine? Has it been tried? Last but not
> least, some know it all at Oshcosh last year was explaining to me all the
> "Inherent Problems" with the KR and he said the airframe will not last long
> due to cracks between the wood and composite material in the airframe.
> Sounded hoaky, but I am wondering what is the highest time airframe anyone
> has seen? Thanks
> Kirk
> kmur...@sprintmail.com
> 
>

Reply via email to