Netters,
I am not a lawyer so may not know what I am talking about so I wish some
of the members of the net who are lawyer's would respond to this message with
their expertise.
It seems to me since every KR aircraft I have ever heard of, including the
two (KR-1 & KR-2) that I and a partner built back in the 70's has been much
modified from the original or the present day plans. Like I think the plans
call for the RAF 48 wing and several builders are using a different wing. KR
aircraft have been extended in length, made wider, have different canopy
configurations, landing gear and the list goes on. If there is any change in
the building process that does not match the plans then it is not a KR Aircraft
but your own design using the KR plans as a building guide. Since it's not a
KR aircraft, why should Rand Robinson have anything to do or say about it??????
Bob Stone, Harker Heights, TX
rsto...@hot.rr.com
