Brian Kraut wrote: > I assume those fuel numbers are with the new airfoil. You should get > less fuel with the old one.
No, that was with the RAF48 that you get 106 square inches, in the drawing, that is. Not a whole lot of difference between RAF48 and AS5046, but a 20 percent increase in fuel capacity with the thicker AS5048. > I noticed an interesting statement in that section on your web site; "At > this rate, I'll certainly be flying next year (1999). ". I have been > sayint three months for the last year. Now I am finally realistically > saying three weeks. I noticed that sentence too. I'm well into 9 years and 4100 hours... Mark Langford, Huntsville, AL N56ML "at" hiwaay.net see KR2S project at http://home.hiwaay.net/~langford
