On 10/3/2016 5:58 AM, Mark Langford via KRnet wrote: > Kayak Chris wrote: > >> Dumb question, can I assume this suggestion applies to the kr1 kr1.5 >> etc (all kr variants) as well? > > Probably so. Few people build KR1's anymore (it's usually a KR2S > that's narrowed a bit), so nobody's built a KR1 with the new airfoil, > but it is interchangeable with the RAF48, but with more efficient > performance. > > I shouldn't even have said "new KR2"....having flown KR2S and the KR2 > for hundreds of hours each, and the fact that building an S is almost > exactly the same labor and cost as a KR2, I think you'd be crazy to > build a new KR2 when the KR2S is so much better. > > See more on this kind of stuff at http://www.n56ml.com/kopinion.html ... > > Mark Langford > ML at N56ML.com > http://www.n56ml.com > > > _______________________________________________ > Search the KRnet Archives at http://tugantek.com/archmailv2-kr/search. > Please see LIST RULES and KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html. > see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to > change options > To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to KRnet-leave at list.krnet.org >
Eat those words. I have just finished my KR1 with the 5048 airfoil. -- *Gary * /Soli Deo Gloria/
