not to mention "the unlikely event of a water landing"  lol
thanks all info appreciated while I try to explore which way to go. 

> To: ml at n56ml.com; krnet at list.krnet.org
> Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 18:06:02 +0100
> Subject: Re: KR> Tri-Gear Retracts?
> From: krnet at list.krnet.org
> 
> Hi, check the website http://members.upc.nl/a.gremmen61/  At the pics 2005 
> you can see the gear system of the cherry bx2. It is nice but also wat mark 
> just noted, it will be add weight. The only positif I think is the dead 
> engine outfield landing. It will save you from a tip over.
> Stef
> 
> --
> Steph and his dad are building the KR-2S     see   
> http://www.masttotaalconcept.nl/kr2
>  
>  
> 
> 
> >----Origineel Bericht----
> >Van : krnet at list.krnet.org
> >Datum : 25/01/2015 16:23
> >Aan : krnet at list.krnet.org
> >Onderwerp : Re: KR> Tri-Gear Retracts?
> >
> >Oh, and the most important reason to go with fixed gear (I can't believe 
> >I left this one out) is the GEAR-UP landing!  I built mine fixed because 
> >I knew if I had retracts, my first landing would be a gear-up landing, 
> >and my third, and my 10th...etc.  I later proved that theory, although I 
> >made it to 93 landings in my 68 year-old Swift before actually 
> >fulfilling that prophecy!
> >
> >There's another school of thought that if you have to land in a field 
> >because of an engine out, damage will be minimized.  In a smooth field 
> >big enough to pull that off, it's true.  But in the case of my hayfield 
> >landing, I needed all the friction I could get.  Without it I was going 
> >to hit a stand of trees that would have totaled the plane, if not me.
> >
> >I'm not trying to discourage you from building retracts or tri-gear 
> >retracts, but you've come to the table with lots of ideas on how to do 
> >things different, and they will all increase building time accordingly, 
> >perhaps exponentially.  That's fine, and I'm a poster child for the 
> >concept, but be prepared to spend a long time accomplishing all your 
> >goals. I'm certainly not saying to "build is by the plans", because the 
> >plans are lacking in many ways.  But choose your modifications 
> >carefully.  As William Wynne likes to say, every day spent building is 
> >another day you are closer to losing your medical.  Hopefully that issue 
> >will be relaxed soon, but you get the point.
> >
> >But as much as I enjoyed building and proving that I can improve the 
> >design and persevere to the end, I can tell you that flying is a lot 
> >more fun than building, at least for me!
> >
> >Mark Langford
> >ML at N56ML.com
> >http://www.n56ml.com
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Search the KRnet Archives at http://tugantek.com/archmailv2-kr/search.
> >To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to KRnet-leave at list.krnet.org
> >please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
> >see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
> >options
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Search the KRnet Archives at http://tugantek.com/archmailv2-kr/search.
> To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to KRnet-leave at list.krnet.org
> please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html
> see http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org to change 
> options

Reply via email to