My KR-2 is plans built.  However, it has Diehl wing skins that does extend 
the total span by 30 inches.  The wing taper is greater than stock plans.  I 
am sure that the Horner tips and winglets also effect the MAC.  The Diehl 
tail group probably has some extra weight beyond the stock plans.  Bottom 
line here is: the MAC and center of lift on my KR-2  is probably about 
2-inches further forward than the stock plans callout.  And still, I used 
the stock plans MAC callout for cg calculations.  Been doing a lot of soul 
searching on this stuff lately.  Having near death experiences in this 
machine will do that to a person.
So, taking Larry Flesner's advice, I am proceeding to carefully make it 
right.  Adding ballast to the nose will likely yield a 120 Kts airplane 
instead of the desired 150 Kts airplane.  In the process I just may live to 
tell about it and be a better person to build another KR.

Sid Wood
Tri-gear KR-2 N6242
Mechanicsville, MD, USA
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>The only thing I would think you would even consider changing is to make
>the c.g. range in percentage of MAC only and not referenced to the leading
>edge,
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

It's been some time since I looked at the plans but I seem to recall
it being stated in percent of MAC and that translated to inches from
the lead edge.  If anything is changed like wing shape, length,
winglets,  the percent of MAC could/ will/ probably change also based
on the new design and anything stated in the plans, like percent of
MAC, also "goes out the window".

As with building to plans, any changes made are still the
responsibility of the builder, not the designer, to test and verify
safety of the design.  The designer is not seeking certification for
your airplane, THE BUILDER IS.  If the inspector notes something he /
she is not comfortable with, they may not pass the inspection.  If
they sign it off it's all on you to test for safety.

We are given a considerable latitude in the EXPERIMENTAL
category.  PROCEED RESPONSIBLY AND WITH CAUTION..........

Larry Flesner






Reply via email to