Em Thursday 07 July 2011, Raphael Kubo da Costa escreveu:
> Michal Zajac <michal.za...@gmail.com> writes:
> > Yes, it is exactly as Raphael said, after the build is finished
> > pkgkde-symbolshelper checks for new or removed symbols and this one
> > popped out. If the symbol is for ex. not public we just remove it
> > without doing anything but from what I saw and confirmed with thiago
> > this one is public and can't be removed without any binary compatibility
> > problems.
> 
> I remember we discussed not keeping BC in libkopete a few months ago,
> but no official decision was made.
> 
> We need to either add that symbol back or officially decide we will not
> keep BC and raise the soversion of libkopete.
> 
> For now I think we could just add the symbol back and deprecate
> it. Lamarque, what do you think?

        I think we should make libkopete private. Kopete is dying, almost 
nobody 
cares about it anymore, only me is adding new features to it and in the 
transition to KDE 5 I really doubt anyone will step up to port it to Qt 5. 
There is no reason to incentivize anyone to use libkopete, so there is no 
reason for it to be public. I will restore the symbol and declare it 
deprecated. I am really thinking in abandon Kopete. Too much trouble for 
almost nothing.

-- 
Lamarque V. Souza
http://www.geographicguide.com/brazil.htm
Linux User #57137 - http://counter.li.org/
http://planetkde.org/pt-br
_______________________________________________
kopete-devel mailing list
kopete-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kopete-devel

Reply via email to