Em 12 de setembro de 2010 16:10, Lamarque Vieira Souza <lamar...@gmail.com>escreveu:
> Hi Luiz, > Hi. > > I think you remember me from Akademy-br. I do. > What exactly do you call a > "Kopete instance"? Is it a separated process? Do you want to run more than > one > Kopete process? At least for now I think that is not possible, Kopete is > coded > to run only one instance per user as far as I know. > I'm aware of that, but it doesn't need necessarely to be a separate instance; there would be a contactlist per identity instead of only one contactlist holding all the identities on a computer, but the process could be the same. However, when a user re-opened Kopete - by typing "kopete" on Alt+F2 or through the menu, it would show an identitylist, each one showing its label, picture and accounts, showing also the connected ones, their text being bold. I think having a Kopete process per account would be better, but that's up to the mantainer. > > Having more than one identify for one instance has its use, so has > using > different passwords for each identify (if configured to do so). I think > that > is what you want, right? Kind of. Not only that, but, as I already said, a separate contactlist and conversation window(s). > I am not familiar with this part of Kopete's > internals. Two months ago I talked to Daniel (from KDE-MG) about this > problem > and we are not sure if it is possible to make one kopete process to have > one > password for each identity. Does anyone here know if that is possible? > Maybe, via KWallet. One could assing a wallet per user, if they wanted to. Or the user could have a master password for their identity, but that's basically Kwallet's concept. > > Em Sunday 12 September 2010, Luiz Romário Santana Rios escreveu: > > Resending without attachment. > > > > Hello for the first time. > > > > I had some ideas for Kopete which I'm willing to implement. Here's an > image > > to help you understading: > > http://img844.imageshack.us/img844/2646/ideiaskopete.png > > > > But it basically separates one identity for Kopete instance, since it > makes > > no sense to have more than one indentity an a same Kopete instance in my > > opinion. Beyond, it gives the user the option to login quickly into an > > account. > > > > What do you think? If you think it's fine, then I'll need some help on > > Kopete internals. > > > > Best regards. > > > -- > Lamarque V. Souza > http://www.geographicguide.com/brazil.htm > Linux User #57137 - http://counter.li.org/ > http://www.kde-mg.org > Best regards. -- Luiz Romário Santana Rios
_______________________________________________ kopete-devel mailing list kopete-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kopete-devel
