Raphael Kubo da Costa schrieb: > On Sunday 07 February 2010 11:27:17 Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote: > >> On Sunday 07 February 2010 09:56:59 Frank Schaefer wrote: >> >>> Matt Rogers schrieb: >>> >>>> On Sunday 24 January 2010 10:14:28 am Frank Schaefer wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> most distros still compile their packages without libv4l, but it is in >>>>> fact indispensable. >>>>> Too many video-device are using custom-decoders and we can't >>>>> provide them all (it's also hard to follow kernel-development). >>>>> We have many bug-reports about not working devices and AFAICS most of >>>>> them (e.g. 195095, 165357, 166563, 192326, 195811) are caused >>>>> by packages beeing compiled without libv4l. >>>>> That's why I would like to make libv4l a requiste for building. >>>>> Any objections ? ;) >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Frank >>>>> >>>> I'm fine with this, as long as we make it linux only for the time >>>> being. -- >>>> Matt >>>> >>> Sorry for the delay, I didn't find the time to test it during the last >>> week. I commited the solution suggested by Raphael to the trunk, it works >>> fine. Thanks again ! >>> I would really like to apply these 2 commits to the 4.4-branch, too. >>> Raphael, do you want to port your cmake-module-changes to 4.4 yourself >>> or should I do that for you ? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Frank >>> >> Feel free to do that if you want, I'll only be able to do that tomorrow. >> > > Right, I've just backported that cleanup commit to the 4.4 branch; as for the > rest of the commits you want to backport, I see there are some different > opinions on the matter around. Maybe it'd be good to discuss it or just leave > LibV4L2 an optional dependency? > > Cheers, > Raphael Thanks Raphael, let's see how the discussion goes on. No need to hurry.
Frank _______________________________________________ kopete-devel mailing list kopete-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kopete-devel
