Or we have the option of not caring at all once an ORM is in place! --joe On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 7:23 AM, Galen Charlton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Hi, > > On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 4:24 AM, Paul POULAIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > In fact I don't care. But atm we have some tables plural, and some > > singular. and for sure, that's a pity ! > > I'm for a unique rule ! > > and there are more plural than singular, so that would be easier to > > switch to plural I think. > > Roughly speaking, 70% of the table names have plural names and 30% > singular. Although it would be nice to pick a convention and change > all table names to match, I'm not in favor of renaming biblio to > biblios at this point due to the number of queries on that table that > would have to be changed and the risk of adding bugs. We'll be better > able to make such name changes once an ORM is in place. > > Regards, > > Galen > -- > Galen Charlton > VP, Research & Development, LibLime > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > p: 1-888-564-2457 x709 > skype: gmcharlt > _______________________________________________ > Koha-devel mailing list > Koha-devel@lists.koha.org > http://lists.koha.org/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel >
_______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list Koha-devel@lists.koha.org http://lists.koha.org/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel
