Hi, On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 4:24 AM, Paul POULAIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In fact I don't care. But atm we have some tables plural, and some > singular. and for sure, that's a pity ! > I'm for a unique rule ! > and there are more plural than singular, so that would be easier to > switch to plural I think.
Roughly speaking, 70% of the table names have plural names and 30% singular. Although it would be nice to pick a convention and change all table names to match, I'm not in favor of renaming biblio to biblios at this point due to the number of queries on that table that would have to be changed and the risk of adding bugs. We'll be better able to make such name changes once an ORM is in place. Regards, Galen -- Galen Charlton VP, Research & Development, LibLime [EMAIL PROTECTED] p: 1-888-564-2457 x709 skype: gmcharlt _______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list Koha-devel@lists.koha.org http://lists.koha.org/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel
