On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Kyle Hall <kyle.m.h...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It's been discussed a few times, but I think we need to formalize naming > conventions when writing patches for Koha. > > The worse offenders are those things that we use many different names for > both internally and externally. I think patrons/borrowers/members is the > worst offender. List come to mind as well ( previously being virtual > shelves ). > > I believe that our internal nomenclature should reflect our outward > nomenclature. So if the staff and/or OPAC use the term "patron" we should > be using the term "patron" in our code as well, especially for namespaces. > > What does everyone think? > > +1 Kind Regards, Chris
_______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list Koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
