Hi, On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 12:40 AM, Paul Poulain <paul.poul...@biblibre.com> wrote: > Another option I see could be to remove the "3." and name version 12.0, > 12.1, 12.2, 14.0, 14.1,... (that would be fine for the current > updatedatabase mechanism)
I don't ask much of version number schemes. Really just two things: first, that they increase from version to version. Second, that we don't spend a great deal of time discussing them. :) Consequently, I'd be happy if we kept the 3.x series going indefinitely, or if we bumped up the major version number when it felt right, or if we dropped the "3." and called the fall release 13.0 or 14.0. Whatever gets decided, I *do* strongly feel that we collectively promise to stick to it for at least three years -- and *not* discuss it further. Regards, Galen -- Galen Charlton Manager of Implementation Equinox Software, Inc. / The Open Source Experts email: g...@esilibrary.com direct: +1 770-709-5581 cell: +1 404-984-4366 skype: gmcharlt web: http://www.esilibrary.com/ Supporting Koha and Evergreen: http://koha-community.org & http://evergreen-ils.org _______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list Koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
