On 2012-11-16, at 9:07 AM, Robin Sheat wrote: > Op 16-11-12 09:00, MJ Ray schreef: >> I feel that would be misrepresenting GPL2+ code as GPL3+ - lying, more >> or less. I would prefer it if we only updated headers to GPL3+ when >> the code in that file actually changes to require the licence change. > > There is no real point changing the headers on their own, but changing > them if there's a particular desire or reason to isn't bad. If I add > code, and I want it to be GPL3+, changing the headers is then the > correct thing to do. > > TBH, if we changed a couple of core parts (e.g. C4::Context and > C4::Template) that would effectively flow on to the rest of the bundle, > unless someone who particularly wanted a GPL2 version reverted them. > > Robin.
either of those two suggestions sound great to me _______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list Koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
