Op 16-11-12 09:00, MJ Ray schreef: > I feel that would be misrepresenting GPL2+ code as GPL3+ - lying, more > or less. I would prefer it if we only updated headers to GPL3+ when > the code in that file actually changes to require the licence change.
There is no real point changing the headers on their own, but changing them if there's a particular desire or reason to isn't bad. If I add code, and I want it to be GPL3+, changing the headers is then the correct thing to do. TBH, if we changed a couple of core parts (e.g. C4::Context and C4::Template) that would effectively flow on to the rest of the bundle, unless someone who particularly wanted a GPL2 version reverted them. Robin.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list Koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
