On 10/04/2018 04:56 PM, Tomasz Wlostowski wrote: > On 04/10/18 19:18, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: >> On 10/4/2018 1:11 PM, Seth Hillbrand wrote: >>> Am Do., 4. Okt. 2018 um 09:58 Uhr schrieb Wayne Stambaugh >>> <stambau...@gmail.com <mailto:stambau...@gmail.com>>: >>> >>> Still waiting for the macos fix to tag 5.0.1. >>> >>> >>> The 5.0.1 bug doesn't affect 5.1 as far as I can tell. >> >> It's the delta I'm worried about. This is a significant change of >> non-UI code. If we would have a critical eeschema bug in the 5.0 branch >> between now and 5.0.1 release, it makes the probability of merge >> conflicts just that much greater. If the macos fix is going to drag on >> too long, them maybe we could make the argument to merge it. I figured >> we would already have tagged 5.0.1 by now. Are we having fun yet? ;) > > Hi Wayne, > > I share your concerns, nonetheless I agree with Seth to merge the GAL > branch to the nightlies as soon as possible. If we'll find another > critical bug, these are - in my experience - usually overlooked corner > cases or memory management issues and fixing them doesn't require a lot > of code changes. Cherry-picking them to 5.0.1 would IMHO take much less > time than waiting for the feedback on eeschema-gal and delaying the 5.1. > > Cheers, > Tom >
I'm willing to allow this to be merged on Monday if we still do not have a solution for the macos issue so we can tag 5.0.1. Cheers, Wayne _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
