Rebased branch pushed. > On 27 Sep 2018, at 19:22, Jeff Young <j...@rokeby.ie> wrote: > > PS: By “push” I mean to my public repo, not to master. ;) > >> On 27 Sep 2018, at 19:18, Jeff Young <j...@rokeby.ie >> <mailto:j...@rokeby.ie>> wrote: >> >> I have re-based the GAL branch on master. I’ll push once I’ve built it and >> shaken out any obvious issues. >> >> Cheers, >> Jeff. >> >> >>> On 24 Sep 2018, at 23:13, Jeff Young <j...@rokeby.ie >>> <mailto:j...@rokeby.ie>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Tom, >>> >>> I’m happy to do it. Do I have your latest changes? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Jeff. >>> >>> >>>> On 24 Sep 2018, at 19:54, Tomasz Wlostowski <tomasz.wlostow...@cern.ch >>>> <mailto:tomasz.wlostow...@cern.ch>> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 24/09/18 20:07, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: >>>>> Hey Jeff, >>>>> >>>>> On 9/21/2018 9:49 AM, Jeff Young wrote: >>>>>> Hi Tom, >>>>>> >>>>>> Do you have additional fixes that are not in your branch of my repo? >>>>>> >>>>>> If not, does it make sense for me to rebase it on master? (It would >>>>>> have to become “truth” at that point, but you could clone back from it.) >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> Jeff. >>>>> >>>>> From the testing I've done, this seems ready for wider user testing. I >>>>> think we ( and by we I mean you and Tom ;) ) should start preparing to >>>>> merge this into the development branch. I'm guessing giving the >>>>> original starting branch that there are going to be some serious merge >>>>> conflicts to be resolved. As soon as 5.0.1 tagged, I say we pull the >>>>> trigger on this and start working towards 5.1. I know this doesn't >>>>> impact the dev branch but as soon as the gal changes get merged, fixing >>>>> bugs in both the stable 5 and dev branch are going to be significantly >>>>> more difficult. If anyone has any objections to this proposal, now >>>>> would be the time. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Hi Wayne, >>>> >>>> Sounds like a plan! It was already rebased on the master a bit less than >>>> a month ago, so I don't expect huge merging conflicts. I'd suggest >>>> rebasing it first on the top of the current master and then doing the >>>> merge. I also found some minor drawing issues while testing around a >>>> week ago and have no idea of someone else hasn't already fixed them: >>>> - arcs disappear at higher zoom levels, >>>> - 180 degree arcs in certain inductor symbols were not drawn at all, >>>> - hierarchical labels disappear after moving (only become visible at >>>> small zoom). >>>> >>>> @Jeff: Would you like to do the rebase or should I do it (I'm a bit busy >>>> this week, so can't promise any dates)? >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Tom >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers >>> <https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers> >>> Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net >>> <mailto:kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net> >>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers >>> <https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers> >>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >>> <https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers >> <https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers> >> Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net >> <mailto:kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net> >> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers >> <https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers> >> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >> <https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp> > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
