PS: By “push” I mean to my public repo, not to master. ;) > On 27 Sep 2018, at 19:18, Jeff Young <j...@rokeby.ie> wrote: > > I have re-based the GAL branch on master. I’ll push once I’ve built it and > shaken out any obvious issues. > > Cheers, > Jeff. > > >> On 24 Sep 2018, at 23:13, Jeff Young <j...@rokeby.ie >> <mailto:j...@rokeby.ie>> wrote: >> >> Hi Tom, >> >> I’m happy to do it. Do I have your latest changes? >> >> Cheers, >> Jeff. >> >> >>> On 24 Sep 2018, at 19:54, Tomasz Wlostowski <tomasz.wlostow...@cern.ch >>> <mailto:tomasz.wlostow...@cern.ch>> wrote: >>> >>> On 24/09/18 20:07, Wayne Stambaugh wrote: >>>> Hey Jeff, >>>> >>>> On 9/21/2018 9:49 AM, Jeff Young wrote: >>>>> Hi Tom, >>>>> >>>>> Do you have additional fixes that are not in your branch of my repo? >>>>> >>>>> If not, does it make sense for me to rebase it on master? (It would have >>>>> to become “truth” at that point, but you could clone back from it.) >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Jeff. >>>> >>>> From the testing I've done, this seems ready for wider user testing. I >>>> think we ( and by we I mean you and Tom ;) ) should start preparing to >>>> merge this into the development branch. I'm guessing giving the >>>> original starting branch that there are going to be some serious merge >>>> conflicts to be resolved. As soon as 5.0.1 tagged, I say we pull the >>>> trigger on this and start working towards 5.1. I know this doesn't >>>> impact the dev branch but as soon as the gal changes get merged, fixing >>>> bugs in both the stable 5 and dev branch are going to be significantly >>>> more difficult. If anyone has any objections to this proposal, now >>>> would be the time. >>>> >>> >>> Hi Wayne, >>> >>> Sounds like a plan! It was already rebased on the master a bit less than >>> a month ago, so I don't expect huge merging conflicts. I'd suggest >>> rebasing it first on the top of the current master and then doing the >>> merge. I also found some minor drawing issues while testing around a >>> week ago and have no idea of someone else hasn't already fixed them: >>> - arcs disappear at higher zoom levels, >>> - 180 degree arcs in certain inductor symbols were not drawn at all, >>> - hierarchical labels disappear after moving (only become visible at >>> small zoom). >>> >>> @Jeff: Would you like to do the rebase or should I do it (I'm a bit busy >>> this week, so can't promise any dates)? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Tom >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers >> <https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers> >> Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net >> <mailto:kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net> >> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers >> <https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers> >> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >> <https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp> > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
