Hi Thomas- Thank you for the contribution! Right now KiCad only uses C++11. But once we move up to C++17, we will want to minimize code paths so that everyone sees the same result. Otherwise we risk introducing bugs that _really_ hard to track down. In other words, replacing boost:: with std:: in this case with no #if clause will make sense once the call is made to change up to C++17. Maybe we can do that during v6 development?
-S Am Do., 19. Juli 2018 um 12:58 Uhr schrieb Thomas Figueroa < tom_figue...@hotmail.com>: > Hello everyone, my name is Thomas. I’ve posted a few times on here to > submit some feedback, but > > now I have finally mustered the courage to submit stuff for development. > > This first pair of patches is really just to get a feel for things and get > feedback on any issues with > > my process or potential problems. > > I look forward to contributing to KiCad as much as it has contributed to > me having it for my job 😊 > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
