On 1/20/2018 11:49 AM, jp charras wrote: > Le 20/01/2018 à 17:34, Wayne Stambaugh a écrit : >> On 1/20/2018 10:58 AM, jp charras wrote: >>> Le 20/01/2018 à 16:40, Wayne Stambaugh a écrit : >>>> I concur. We should not be violating clearances even in the small >>>> amounts in this bug report. I realize that this change will create a >>>> diff when existing designs are refilled but it is a more technically >>>> correct solution. Until (if?) we support arcs for this, I would prefer >>>> to err on the side of caution. @JP and @Tom, the two of you have >>>> written most of the polygon generation code, is there any reason not to >>>> change this. >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> >>>> Wayne >>> >>> We can temporary use the proposed patch. >>> >>> I'll try to calculate (later) a more exact shape. >>> Currently the simplified calculation creates a slightly smaller shape than >>> required. >>> (No need to wait for arc support: just enhance the current calculation to >>> create a better shape) >> >> Hey JP, >> >> How soon is "later"? If you can get this fixed in the next week or so, >> then I would rather not use a temporary patch. However, if later is two >> months from now, then applying this patch makes more sense. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Wayne >> > > I'll try to fix it next week. > > If I cannot, I'll use the proposed patch.
Thank you for help JP. I appreciate it. > >>> >>> The proposed patch creates a slightly bigger shape than required. >>> >>>> >>>> On 1/19/2018 10:30 AM, Maciej Sumiński wrote: >>>>> After reading the bug report, I consider the changes proposed by Julius >>>>> sensible. What do you think? In particular I am asking our geometry >>>>> experts. >>>>> >> > > _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
