Le 20/01/2018 à 17:34, Wayne Stambaugh a écrit : > On 1/20/2018 10:58 AM, jp charras wrote: >> Le 20/01/2018 à 16:40, Wayne Stambaugh a écrit : >>> I concur. We should not be violating clearances even in the small >>> amounts in this bug report. I realize that this change will create a >>> diff when existing designs are refilled but it is a more technically >>> correct solution. Until (if?) we support arcs for this, I would prefer >>> to err on the side of caution. @JP and @Tom, the two of you have >>> written most of the polygon generation code, is there any reason not to >>> change this. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Wayne >> >> We can temporary use the proposed patch. >> >> I'll try to calculate (later) a more exact shape. >> Currently the simplified calculation creates a slightly smaller shape than >> required. >> (No need to wait for arc support: just enhance the current calculation to >> create a better shape) > > Hey JP, > > How soon is "later"? If you can get this fixed in the next week or so, > then I would rather not use a temporary patch. However, if later is two > months from now, then applying this patch makes more sense. > > Thanks, > > Wayne >
I'll try to fix it next week. If I cannot, I'll use the proposed patch. >> >> The proposed patch creates a slightly bigger shape than required. >> >>> >>> On 1/19/2018 10:30 AM, Maciej Sumiński wrote: >>>> After reading the bug report, I consider the changes proposed by Julius >>>> sensible. What do you think? In particular I am asking our geometry >>>> experts. >>>> > -- Jean-Pierre CHARRAS _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
