On Mon, Jun 22, 2026 at 09:52:40AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Having them as a stop-gap until true NMI is available
> seems nice to me
I completely agree. Should these patches unfortunately not make it upstream,
my plan is to maintain them downstream at Meta kernels until the Meta fleet
no longer contains any non-FEAT_NMI hosts.
The trade-offs under consideration are:
1) Accept the performance overhead from pseudo-NMI
2) Lose debuggability by disabling NMI entirely
3) Maintain downstream patches
Of these three options, carrying downstream patches appears to be the least
disruptive path for our business needs.
