** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Focal)
       Status: Incomplete => Fix Released

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Bionic)
       Status: Incomplete => Invalid

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Groovy)
       Status: Incomplete => In Progress

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Groovy)
     Assignee: (unassigned) => Po-Hsu Lin (cypressyew)

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Hirsute)
       Status: Incomplete => Fix Released

** Changed in: linux-oem-5.6 (Ubuntu Focal)
       Status: New => In Progress

** Changed in: linux-oem-5.6 (Ubuntu Focal)
     Assignee: (unassigned) => Po-Hsu Lin (cypressyew)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux-oem-5.6 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1909647

Title:
  xfrm_policy.sh in net from ubuntu_kernel_selftests passed with failed
  sub-cases

Status in ubuntu-kernel-tests:
  In Progress
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in linux-oem-5.6 package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in linux source package in Bionic:
  Invalid
Status in linux-oem-5.6 source package in Bionic:
  Invalid
Status in linux source package in Focal:
  Fix Released
Status in linux-oem-5.6 source package in Focal:
  In Progress
Status in linux source package in Groovy:
  In Progress
Status in linux-oem-5.6 source package in Groovy:
  Invalid
Status in linux source package in Hirsute:
  Fix Released
Status in linux-oem-5.6 source package in Hirsute:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  There are failed cases in the xfrm_policy.sh test, but the overall result is 
PASS
  $ sudo ./xfrm_policy.sh
   # selftests: net: xfrm_policy.sh
   # PASS: policy before exception matches
   # FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions)
   # PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions)
   # PASS: policy matches (exceptions)
   # FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions and block policies)
   # PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions and block policies)
   # PASS: policy matches (exceptions and block policies)
   # FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions and block policies after 
hresh changes)
   # PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions and block policies after hresh 
changes)
   # PASS: policy matches (exceptions and block policies after hresh changes)
   # FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions and block policies after 
hthresh change in ns3)
   # PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions and block policies after hthresh 
change in ns3)
   # PASS: policy matches (exceptions and block policies after hthresh change 
in ns3)
   # FAIL: expected ping to .254 to fail (exceptions and block policies after 
htresh change to normal)
   # PASS: direct policy matches (exceptions and block policies after htresh 
change to normal)
   # PASS: policy matches (exceptions and block policies after htresh change to 
normal)
   # PASS: policies with repeated htresh change
   ok 12 selftests: net: xfrm_policy.sh
  $ echo $?
  0

  This is because of the variable "lret" in check_xfrm() is not a local
  variable, and it looks like it will override the one in
  check_exceptions() thus making the return value become 0 for the
  passed test case after the failed one.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-kernel-tests/+bug/1909647/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to     : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to