This bug is missing log files that will aid in diagnosing the problem.
>From a terminal window please run:
apport-collect 1653039
and then change the status of the bug to 'Confirmed'.
If, due to the nature of the issue you have encountered, you are unable
to run this command, please add a comment stating that fact and change
the bug status to 'Confirmed'.
This change has been made by an automated script, maintained by the
Ubuntu Kernel Team.
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1653039
Title:
ubuntu_seccomp test failed on 3.2.0-120.163 - virtual x86_64(aws)
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
Incomplete
Bug description:
Kernel: 3.2.0-120.163 - virtual
Fail items:
[ FAIL ] global.ERRNO_capped
[ FAIL ] global.seccomp_syscall
[ FAIL ] global.seccomp_syscall_mode_lock
[ FAIL ] global.TSYNC_first
[ FAIL ] global.ERRNO_capped
[ FAIL ] global.seccomp_syscall
[ FAIL ] global.seccomp_syscall_mode_lock
[ FAIL ] global.TSYNC_first
[ FAIL ] TSYNC.siblings_fail_prctl
[ FAIL ] global.ERRNO_capped
[ FAIL ] global.seccomp_syscall
[ FAIL ] global.seccomp_syscall_mode_lock
[ FAIL ] global.TSYNC_first
[ FAIL ] TSYNC.siblings_fail_prctl
[ FAIL ] TSYNC.two_siblings_with_ancestor
[ FAIL ] global.ERRNO_capped
[ FAIL ] global.seccomp_syscall
[ FAIL ] global.seccomp_syscall_mode_lock
[ FAIL ] global.TSYNC_first
[ FAIL ] TSYNC.siblings_fail_prctl
[ FAIL ] TSYNC.two_siblings_with_ancestor
[ FAIL ] TSYNC.two_siblings_with_no_filter
[ FAIL ] global.ERRNO_capped
[ FAIL ] global.seccomp_syscall
[ FAIL ] global.seccomp_syscall_mode_lock
[ FAIL ] global.TSYNC_first
[ FAIL ] TSYNC.siblings_fail_prctl
[ FAIL ] TSYNC.two_siblings_with_ancestor
[ FAIL ] TSYNC.two_siblings_with_no_filter
[ FAIL ] TSYNC.two_siblings_with_one_divergence
[ FAIL ] global.ERRNO_capped
[ FAIL ] global.seccomp_syscall
[ FAIL ] global.seccomp_syscall_mode_lock
[ FAIL ] global.TSYNC_first
[ FAIL ] TSYNC.siblings_fail_prctl
[ FAIL ] TSYNC.two_siblings_with_ancestor
[ FAIL ] TSYNC.two_siblings_with_no_filter
[ FAIL ] TSYNC.two_siblings_with_one_divergence
[ FAIL ] TSYNC.two_siblings_not_under_filter
stderr:
seccomp_bpf_tests.c:535:global.ERRNO_capped:Expected -1 (4294967295) ==
read(0, ((void *)0), 0) (18446744073709547520)
seccomp_bpf_tests.c:536:global.ERRNO_capped:Expected 4095 (4095) ==
(*__errno_location ()) (0)
seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1322:global.seccomp_syscall:Expected 22 (22) ==
(*__errno_location ()) (38)
seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1323:global.seccomp_syscall:Did not reject crazy op value!
seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1328:global.seccomp_syscall:Expected 22 (22) ==
(*__errno_location ()) (38)
seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1329:global.seccomp_syscall:Did not reject mode strict
with flags!
seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1332:global.seccomp_syscall:Expected 22 (22) ==
(*__errno_location ()) (38)
seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1333:global.seccomp_syscall:Did not reject mode strict
with uargs!
seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1338:global.seccomp_syscall:Expected 22 (22) ==
(*__errno_location ()) (38)
seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1339:global.seccomp_syscall:Did not reject crazy filter
flags!
seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1342:global.seccomp_syscall:Expected 14 (14) ==
(*__errno_location ()) (38)
seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1343:global.seccomp_syscall:Did not reject NULL filter!
seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1347:global.seccomp_syscall:Expected 0 (0) ==
(*__errno_location ()) (38)
seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1349:global.seccomp_syscall:Kernel does not support
SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER: Function not implemented
seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1367:global.seccomp_syscall_mode_lock:Expected 0 (0) ==
ret (18446744073709551615)
seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1368:global.seccomp_syscall_mode_lock:Could not install
filter!
seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1373:global.seccomp_syscall_mode_lock:Expected 22 (22) ==
(*__errno_location ()) (38)
seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1374:global.seccomp_syscall_mode_lock:Switched to mode
strict!
global.seccomp_syscall_mode_lock: Test terminated unexpectedly by signal 9
seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1398:global.TSYNC_first:Expected 0 (0) == ret
(18446744073709551615)
seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1399:global.TSYNC_first:Could not install initial filter
with TSYNC!
seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1550:TSYNC.siblings_fail_prctl:Expected 0 (0) == ret
(18446744073709551615)
seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1551:TSYNC.siblings_fail_prctl:setting filter failed
TSYNC.siblings_fail_prctl: Test terminated by assertion
seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1586:TSYNC.two_siblings_with_ancestor:Expected 0 (0) ==
ret (18446744073709551615)
seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1587:TSYNC.two_siblings_with_ancestor:Kernel does not
support SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER!
TSYNC.two_siblings_with_ancestor: Test terminated by assertion
seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1658:TSYNC.two_siblings_with_no_filter:Expected 0 (0) ==
ret (18446744073709551615)
seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1659:TSYNC.two_siblings_with_no_filter:Could install
filter on all threads!
TSYNC.two_siblings_with_no_filter: Test terminated by assertion
seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1685:TSYNC.two_siblings_with_one_divergence:Expected 0
(0) == ret (18446744073709551615)
seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1686:TSYNC.two_siblings_with_one_divergence:Kernel does
not support SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER!
TSYNC.two_siblings_with_one_divergence: Test terminated by assertion
seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1741:TSYNC.two_siblings_not_under_filter:Expected 0 (0)
== ret (18446744073709551615)
seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1742:TSYNC.two_siblings_not_under_filter:Kernel does not
support SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER!
complete log: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/23704140/
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1653039/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
