This is not part of the qa-regression-testing tests. Moving over to the kernel. Thanks.
** Project changed: qa-regression-testing => linux (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1653039 Title: ubuntu_seccomp test failed on 3.2.0-120.163 - virtual x86_64(aws) Status in linux package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Kernel: 3.2.0-120.163 - virtual Fail items: [ FAIL ] global.ERRNO_capped [ FAIL ] global.seccomp_syscall [ FAIL ] global.seccomp_syscall_mode_lock [ FAIL ] global.TSYNC_first [ FAIL ] global.ERRNO_capped [ FAIL ] global.seccomp_syscall [ FAIL ] global.seccomp_syscall_mode_lock [ FAIL ] global.TSYNC_first [ FAIL ] TSYNC.siblings_fail_prctl [ FAIL ] global.ERRNO_capped [ FAIL ] global.seccomp_syscall [ FAIL ] global.seccomp_syscall_mode_lock [ FAIL ] global.TSYNC_first [ FAIL ] TSYNC.siblings_fail_prctl [ FAIL ] TSYNC.two_siblings_with_ancestor [ FAIL ] global.ERRNO_capped [ FAIL ] global.seccomp_syscall [ FAIL ] global.seccomp_syscall_mode_lock [ FAIL ] global.TSYNC_first [ FAIL ] TSYNC.siblings_fail_prctl [ FAIL ] TSYNC.two_siblings_with_ancestor [ FAIL ] TSYNC.two_siblings_with_no_filter [ FAIL ] global.ERRNO_capped [ FAIL ] global.seccomp_syscall [ FAIL ] global.seccomp_syscall_mode_lock [ FAIL ] global.TSYNC_first [ FAIL ] TSYNC.siblings_fail_prctl [ FAIL ] TSYNC.two_siblings_with_ancestor [ FAIL ] TSYNC.two_siblings_with_no_filter [ FAIL ] TSYNC.two_siblings_with_one_divergence [ FAIL ] global.ERRNO_capped [ FAIL ] global.seccomp_syscall [ FAIL ] global.seccomp_syscall_mode_lock [ FAIL ] global.TSYNC_first [ FAIL ] TSYNC.siblings_fail_prctl [ FAIL ] TSYNC.two_siblings_with_ancestor [ FAIL ] TSYNC.two_siblings_with_no_filter [ FAIL ] TSYNC.two_siblings_with_one_divergence [ FAIL ] TSYNC.two_siblings_not_under_filter stderr: seccomp_bpf_tests.c:535:global.ERRNO_capped:Expected -1 (4294967295) == read(0, ((void *)0), 0) (18446744073709547520) seccomp_bpf_tests.c:536:global.ERRNO_capped:Expected 4095 (4095) == (*__errno_location ()) (0) seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1322:global.seccomp_syscall:Expected 22 (22) == (*__errno_location ()) (38) seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1323:global.seccomp_syscall:Did not reject crazy op value! seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1328:global.seccomp_syscall:Expected 22 (22) == (*__errno_location ()) (38) seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1329:global.seccomp_syscall:Did not reject mode strict with flags! seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1332:global.seccomp_syscall:Expected 22 (22) == (*__errno_location ()) (38) seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1333:global.seccomp_syscall:Did not reject mode strict with uargs! seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1338:global.seccomp_syscall:Expected 22 (22) == (*__errno_location ()) (38) seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1339:global.seccomp_syscall:Did not reject crazy filter flags! seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1342:global.seccomp_syscall:Expected 14 (14) == (*__errno_location ()) (38) seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1343:global.seccomp_syscall:Did not reject NULL filter! seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1347:global.seccomp_syscall:Expected 0 (0) == (*__errno_location ()) (38) seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1349:global.seccomp_syscall:Kernel does not support SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER: Function not implemented seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1367:global.seccomp_syscall_mode_lock:Expected 0 (0) == ret (18446744073709551615) seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1368:global.seccomp_syscall_mode_lock:Could not install filter! seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1373:global.seccomp_syscall_mode_lock:Expected 22 (22) == (*__errno_location ()) (38) seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1374:global.seccomp_syscall_mode_lock:Switched to mode strict! global.seccomp_syscall_mode_lock: Test terminated unexpectedly by signal 9 seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1398:global.TSYNC_first:Expected 0 (0) == ret (18446744073709551615) seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1399:global.TSYNC_first:Could not install initial filter with TSYNC! seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1550:TSYNC.siblings_fail_prctl:Expected 0 (0) == ret (18446744073709551615) seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1551:TSYNC.siblings_fail_prctl:setting filter failed TSYNC.siblings_fail_prctl: Test terminated by assertion seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1586:TSYNC.two_siblings_with_ancestor:Expected 0 (0) == ret (18446744073709551615) seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1587:TSYNC.two_siblings_with_ancestor:Kernel does not support SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER! TSYNC.two_siblings_with_ancestor: Test terminated by assertion seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1658:TSYNC.two_siblings_with_no_filter:Expected 0 (0) == ret (18446744073709551615) seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1659:TSYNC.two_siblings_with_no_filter:Could install filter on all threads! TSYNC.two_siblings_with_no_filter: Test terminated by assertion seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1685:TSYNC.two_siblings_with_one_divergence:Expected 0 (0) == ret (18446744073709551615) seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1686:TSYNC.two_siblings_with_one_divergence:Kernel does not support SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER! TSYNC.two_siblings_with_one_divergence: Test terminated by assertion seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1741:TSYNC.two_siblings_not_under_filter:Expected 0 (0) == ret (18446744073709551615) seccomp_bpf_tests.c:1742:TSYNC.two_siblings_not_under_filter:Kernel does not support SECCOMP_SET_MODE_FILTER! complete log: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/23704140/ To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1653039/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages Post to : kernel-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kernel-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
