On Monday 08 March 2004 16:29, Jason Wood wrote: > > Why do we need the <effect> tag? It looks redundant... maybe I'm missing > > something... why did we introduce it? > > I believe it is performing a similar job to a par tag - an effect is a > "video" that s the output of one or more videos manipulated in some way.
good, then let's kick it and call it <par> as in SMIL (like in the new examples/ ) Cheers, Rolf -- contacts: www.physi.uni-heidelberg.de/~dubitzky
