On Tuesday 24 February 2004 05:36, Jason Wood wrote: > My first aim is to get a simple effect (as opposed to a transition) working > - the effect I had in mind was the invert filter effect, which shows up in > Kdenlive, and if not already fully implemented in piave is presumably quite > simple to implement.
ok. it's completely bit-rotten, but I'll make it worl again. > <seq> > <effect> > <inputs> > <video src="../samples/4x3-PAL.dv" clipBegin="0" > clipEnd="2"/> > </inputs> > <!-- This video tag can contain properties and keyframes for the effect, > however the invertfilter does not have any. --> > <video effect="invertfilter"/> > </effect> > </seq> > > I have not convinced myself that the above syntax is the best, what do > other people think? I think it's ok for now. Ar some point we will probably need to use XML namespaces to seperate the real SMIL part from the VEML add-ons. But I would vote for waiting with this till we actually face a real problem with the current scheme. Cheers, Rolf -- contacts: www.physi.uni-heidelberg.de/~dubitzky
