kdenlive-devel at lists.sourceforge.net schrieb am 19.05.03 11:48:47: > > There is a third solution which I am thinking of, sort of a cross between > > the above two ideas, in which a transition would be 'drawn' across multiple > > tracks (I envisage it as a translucent blue rectangle spanning multuiple > > clips). This would have the advantage of allowing the transition to touch > > multiple tracks, but might be complicated to use, I am not sure yet.
Maybe this could be done by a "Transition tool"? > I like this idea _very_ much. I think it would be pretty easy to use, and > even > more intuitive than the usual "effect-track". Just make sure, that the tracks > and the shaded 'transition-overlay-rectangle' have nice mouse handles to > select/drag/resize them. > Okay, I like the idea too, but here comes just another idea. What you guys thinking about a "build-in transparency curve" for every clip? e.g.: starting with 2 clips in 2 separate tracks, slightly overlapping. Now select the two clips (or maybe _all_ clips you want to incorporate into this transition action), move the upper corner of the first clip to left - the upper corner of the other clip(s) should follow automatically - to create the transition. [advantage] It doesn't matter if the clips are located in ajacent tracks; just select them first. It's similar to the "fading audio clips into another" action. [DISADVANTAGE] Maybe it's hard to recognice which clips are involved within this transition. I'm not sure how to add a new clip to an existing transition. greetings Reinhard
