On Saturday, 6 March 2021 22:40:42 CET David Faure wrote: > Does anyone care for wayland on FreeBSD, or is that not really a thing?
Yes, in the sense that sway, river, wlroots are well-maintained (or at least, up-to-date). I'm told that they work on the desktop, and (even!) telegram- desktop in Wayland is ok as well. On the *plasma* side, not so much. I had a brief look at Plasma-Wayland on Linux over a year ago, it was not-suitable-for-use on Linux so I haven't looked at it on FreeBSD subsequently. It's somewhere on my todo list (and on Tobias's, since like everyone we know X is at its last release). > https://build.kde.org/job/Frameworks/view/Platform%20-%20FreeBSDQt5.15/job/k > wayland/job/kf5-qt5%20FreeBSDQt5.15/51/testReport/junit/projectroot.autotest > s/ > > is very very red, about 50% of the tests fail. 14 fail / 43 today. > I know nothing about wayland, so all I can offer is to skip all wayland > unittests on FreeBSD -- or blacklist those that fail, but if nobody cares > then any future failure would just be as ignored as those, so I don't see > much point. I suppose it's "fine", because I doubt I'll have time to dig into this soon; the first test I look at (testidle) looks more like a failure in file watching than a Wayland problem, really. At some point we'll need to dig into these unittests (like you prompted me to do with kcoreaddons &c). [ade]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
