Hi, Does anyone care for wayland on FreeBSD, or is that not really a thing?
https://build.kde.org/job/Frameworks/view/Platform%20-%20FreeBSDQt5.15/job/kwayland/job/kf5-qt5%20FreeBSDQt5.15/51/testReport/junit/projectroot.autotests/ is very very red, about 50% of the tests fail. They all pass on Linux: https://build.kde.org/job/Frameworks/view/Platform%20-%20SUSEQt5.15/job/kwayland/job/kf5-qt5%20SUSEQt5.15/55/testReport/projectroot.autotests/ I know nothing about wayland, so all I can offer is to skip all wayland unittests on FreeBSD -- or blacklist those that fail, but if nobody cares then any future failure would just be as ignored as those, so I don't see much point. Shall I go ahead? There's nothing "bad" about it, IMHO, if wayland isn't a priority on FreeBSD. Getting to a green CI will make catching regressions everywhere much easier. kwayland is the very last step to get there, all other frameworks pass. https://build.kde.org/job/Frameworks/view/Platform%20-%20FreeBSDQt5.15/ -- David Faure, fa...@kde.org, http://www.davidfaure.fr Working on KDE Frameworks 5
