Hi, Stephen Kelly <steve...@gmail.com> schrieb am So., 29. Dez. 2019, 15:03:
> > On 28/12/2019 23:30, Friedrich W. H. Kossebau wrote: > > Why are you proposing to do a step back instead to the old state, which > > everyone including you considered not that satisfying? > > Because it's a temporary situation. We still have a way forward in KF6 > (which will open in a few months). > > > Generally, getting Grantlee into KF5 now also establishes the wrong > precedent. Grantlee should be split into two repos each with a tier 1 > library (KF6::TextDocument and KF6::TextTemplate). The two are > independent and have nothing to do with each other aside from > authorship. That seems to be something you were objecting to, so I want > to make sure that's something addressed on its own. The two KF6 > libraries will then follow the KF6 naming conventions etc. > With my KTextEditor hat on: KF6:TextDocument implies somehow a link to QTextDocument or KF6:TextEditor, which both is incorrect, right? Before starting this work, let's clarify whether we can find a more unique name (like KF6:GrantleeTextDocument). Since I haven't used Grantlee yet, I sm likely not the best person to find a better name ;) Best regards Dominik >
