ilic accepted this revision. ilic added inline comments. This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
INLINE COMMENTS > davidedmundson wrote in kcatalog.cpp:124 > I think I still need it. > > QHash::value() isn't marked as being atomic so we still need to make sure > we're not reading at the same time as someone else is modifying the hash > table. Hm, right... That makes me wonder where else there should be a lock and it's missing :) But that's for another story. REPOSITORY R249 KI18n BRANCH master REVISION DETAIL https://phabricator.kde.org/D5208 To: davidedmundson, #frameworks, ilic Cc: ilic
