> On Jan. 4, 2016, 7:42 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > anyone tested this on an "affected system"? > > Albert Astals Cid wrote: > I have not, I thought you had made it clear in the past you thought it > was a bad idea since it was all supposed to be widget based anyway.
We're trying to resolve this ;-) KWindowSystem could otherwise never be used by QGuiApplication's As bonus, we can probably unlink Qt6Widgets in "it's certainly not called KF6 - that would be far too simple" :-P (I'm not sure whether we can/should that right now - while you should explicitly link stuff you need, we don't live in a should-land) => If you can, give it a try (compiz isn't provided by my distro) - Thomas ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126403/#review90522 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Jan. 2, 2016, 9:57 a.m., Thomas Lübking wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126403/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Jan. 2, 2016, 9:57 a.m.) > > > Review request for KDE Frameworks, kwin and Albert Astals Cid. > > > Bugs: 354811 > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=354811 > > > Repository: kwindowsystem > > > Description > ------- > > summarized, alternative to https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126397/ > > NOTICE: this compiles but is otherwise *completely* untested! > > > Diffs > ----- > > src/platforms/xcb/kwindowsystem.cpp 9d28704 > > Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126403/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > no, not the least. esp. not on the bug. > > > Thanks, > > Thomas Lübking > >
_______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
