On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Martin Graesslin <mgraess...@kde.org> wrote: > On Monday, November 30, 2015 1:02:01 PM CET Aleix Pol wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Martin Graesslin <mgraess...@kde.org> > wrote: >> > Hi all, >> > >> > there is currently a review request to add OSX specific changes to >> > framework integration plugin [1]. >> > >> > This seems wrong to me. I think our framework integration plugin is about >> > integration Qt applications into the Plasma workspace. In my opinion it >> > should not be used anywhere else. Not on GNOME, not on Windows and not on >> > OSX. The idea of integration is that applications look native on the >> > desired platform. The plugin defines the native look on Plasma and by >> > that using it on other platforms is automatically breaking the >> > integration. >> > >> > Now I understand that some people don't like the native look of their >> > platform and would prefer using Plasma. Sorry I don't have an answer to >> > that. Unfortunately I think it's completely out of scope for the >> > integration platform to be considered outside Plasma. >> > >> > Given that: if people agree with my view that the framework integration is >> > only about Plasma, I suggest that we move the framework integration to >> > kde/ >> > workspace to release it together with Plasma instead of frameworks. >> > >> > Opinions? >> >> Hi, >> I agree with you, I've proposed the same thing as you in the past, >> although there's some issues that would then need to be sorted. >> >> What you actually want is, IMHO, to move the QPlatformTheme plugin >> together with Plasma, but frameworksintegration is not entirely about >> that nowadays: it has code that integrates different frameworks with >> each other: >> - FrameworkIntegrationPlugin: this doesn't really belong in plasma, >> integrates KMessageBox with KNotifications. > > agree, does it belong into framework integration, though?
Well, yes. It's the very reason for the framework to exist. Arguably nothing else belongs in the repository though... ;) > >> - infopage: this is used by applications as well as plasma > > same question: does this belong into framework integration? > >> - KStyle: Plasma can provide styles, but this seems more like a QStyle >> creation framework. > > maybe we need a dedicated kstyle framework? > >> - platformtheme: Plasma integration. There I agree. > > yep, that's what I actually was thinking about. All the defaults for in Plasma Aleix _______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
