On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 9:59 PM, Mark Gaiser <mark...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > The wiki page doesn't state it explicitly [1]. > > The status of move semantics when searching for the status of N3053 on the > compilers that frameworks support: > GCC 4.6 [2] (frameworks requires 4.5) > CLANG 3.0 [3] (frameworks requires 3.1) > Visual Studio 2010/2012 [4] (it has some (most?) move semantics with N3053 > being implemented in 2015. But has it enough till 2012 for normal move > semantics? That i don't know.) > > Allowing this unconditionally (with the exception of *this since that's > apparently fixed in GCC 4.8.1) seems possible since the compiler support > seems there and the operation - when implemented - can give quite nice > benefits. > > [1] > https://community.kde.org/Frameworks/Policies#Frameworks_compiler_requirements_and_C.2B.2B11 > [2] https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx0x.html > [3] http://clang.llvm.org/cxx_status.html > [4] https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh567368.aspx > > _______________________________________________ > Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list > Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel >
You can also use: #ifdef Q_COMPILER_RVALUE_REFS It's used in many places in Qt already. Aleix _______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
