On Friday 31 July 2015 15:11:56 Alex Merry wrote: > So when you say "move semantics", what does that encompass? You can use > rvalue references in 2010 just fine, but someone would need to check that > Qt detects that properly and provides appropriate overloads of various > methods, and you may not get std::move (if you use qMove, it will degrade > properly in std::move's absence, though).
MSDN says that std::move() *does* exist in MSVC 2010. So I think we're probably good to use move semantics. Alex _______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
