> On May 12, 2015, 7:41 p.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
> > +1
> > 
> > I'd like to know other people's opinion on this, as this should end up on 
> > most frameworks.
> > Personally I'm unsure that showing the url will enlighten people, but it's 
> > better that than the terribly verbose and useless cmake errors.

It also shows the description and Extra cmake modules is much easier to Google 
than ecm. I have a script here to do this for all frameworks if we get a few 
more +1's


- Jeremy


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123742/#review80270
-----------------------------------------------------------


On May 12, 2015, 6:28 p.m., Jeremy Whiting wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123742/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 12, 2015, 6:28 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KDE Frameworks and Jeremy Whiting.
> 
> 
> Repository: knewstuff
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Make ECM missing message explain a) what ECM is, and b) where to find it.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   CMakeLists.txt cb23ccb8a9b0421a554b41234c3d9ced3965d378 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123742/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> KNewStuff (and any other framework we add these changes to) now reports the 
> ECM url and name when it isn't found at cmake time.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jeremy Whiting
> 
>

_______________________________________________
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel

Reply via email to