> On Jan. 23, 2015, 1:43 p.m., Vishesh Handa wrote:
> > I'm not against this, but I am curious as to why this is being done. 
> > 
> > I would think that packagers should be building the tests and running them 
> > on their platform and make sure everything passes. We have a strict policy 
> > that all tests must always pass.
> 
> Matthew Dawson wrote:
>     This is mostly useful on source based distributions (specifically, this 
> patch comes from Gentoo).  While in general running tests everywhere would be 
> great, source distro users may not have the cpu time to compile/run tests.  
> Also, some test suites don't work and users may not care to figure out why 
> (for instance, last time I tried enabling tests in Gentoo, binutils failed 
> its suite).
>     
>     For binary distriubtions, I agree they should be running tests 
> (especially since we work to keep them green).  But source based distros 
> aren't so clear cut.

Exactly, packagers do build the tests of course, but that does not mean users 
of source packages should have a permanent dependency on Qt5Test.


- Andreas


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122206/#review74602
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Jan. 22, 2015, 7:48 p.m., Andreas Sturmlechner wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122206/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 22, 2015, 7:48 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KDE Frameworks.
> 
> 
> Repository: kio
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> [kio] Make tests optional
> This is a small patch to CMakeLists.txt to only depend on Qt5Test if 
> BUILD_TESTING.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   CMakeLists.txt 7fe0be5d4b2d7d9475a7844b4f8d93fc2f0a00c3 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/122206/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Andreas Sturmlechner
> 
>

_______________________________________________
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel

Reply via email to