On Monday 22 September 2014 22:26:06 David Faure wrote: > On Saturday 13 September 2014 20:29:18 Luigi Toscano wrote: > > Luigi Toscano ha scritto: > > > Nicolás Alvarez ha scritto: > > >> 2014-09-13 15:13 GMT-03:00 Nicolás Alvarez <nicolas.alva...@gmail.com>: > > >>> Done. The resulting history looks kind of weird though, because we > > >>> have the full history of kio_trash but only partial history of kio, if > > >>> you didn't graft kdelibs in. > > >> > > >> In fact, half the commits in kio are now from kio_trash. I didn't push > > >> yet. I wonder if we should do the graft thing instead... > > Strange, I didn't think there were that many commits to kio_trash. > > Indeed, 618 commits - but just 388 after removing scripty. > Most of them qt3->qt4 and qt4->qt5 porting ;) > > > > It was already done for kdoctools (where you can see two parents). I > > > would > > > say it makes sense to import just the post-split commits, as you are > > > grafting kdelibs anyway for kio history. > > > > ... but kio_trash comes from kde-runtime. Well, double grafting is > > possible > > and maybe easier than full import anyway. > > I'm fine with grafting, although I guess git-qt-grafts won't work since it > only looks at the very first commit in the repo? So I guess this will > require manual grafting - which in my case means "cd > 4/kde/kde-runtime/kioslave/trash" will just be faster anyway. > I still have some kde3 svn modules checked out, so I'll be keeping kde4 git > modules around for a very long time I'm sure :-)
Ping? Can this be done before saturday? Anything I can do to help? -- David Faure, fa...@kde.org, http://www.davidfaure.fr Working on KDE Frameworks 5 _______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
