On Saturday 02 August 2014 11:50:17 David Faure wrote:
> Then let's go more "bare bones" in frameworks that can't afford the
> KConfigWidgets dependency, but let's provide the more convenient and more
> usable "out of the box" solution in frameworks that can provide it, such as
> KIO?

Well, if you see no problem in growing your dependency on KConfigWidgets sure. 
You're maintaining KIO after all.

Regards.
-- 
Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net

KDAB - proud supporter of KDE, http://www.kdab.com

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel

Reply via email to