On Wednesday 16 July 2014 22:05:21 Kevin Ottens wrote: > On Wednesday 16 July 2014 10:33:43 David Faure wrote: > > On Tuesday 15 July 2014 15:16:20 Kevin Ottens wrote: > > > (ie at most a > > > > > > widget would be enough for the app related settings, we should talk to > > > the > > > underlying platform for the other ones). > > > > I don't want users to have to configure their search engines in 10 KDE > > apps > > one after the other by hand. > > A centralized configuration is much more convenient. > > Maybe I was unclear, but I didn't mean to imply that for something like the > web shortcuts having a centralized configuration was wrong. I think that > shipping a KCM is wrong. But I'm fine with a widget which provide mean to > save in a centralized configuration.
OK, then what is the difference with making that widget inherit from KCModule so that it's also available in systemsettings - as long as the applications also show that KCModule directly in the application, like konqueror does when you use "Configure Konqueror" ? -- David Faure, fa...@kde.org, http://www.davidfaure.fr Working on KDE Frameworks 5 _______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
