On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 1:36 AM, Alexander Potashev <aspotas...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2014-07-31 1:56 GMT+04:00 Albert Astals Cid <aa...@kde.org>: > > The reason is that frameworks being a more "disperse" set of libraries > (i.e. > > they can be used on a one or many basis for other projects) doing a > global > > percentage is probably not a good idea (and we ship the translations > > individually anyway for each framework) > +1, I think it makes sense to let the distribution channels to decide. > > Albert, > > I agree with you in that doing a global percentage is bad, okay: some > 3rd party applications might be happy with just KWidgetsAddons, and so > a global percentage would stop it from being translated because you > translated only kwidgetsaddons.po and not the other frameworks. > > But doing per-framework percentages is no bueno, either: imagine your > app uses KService and you translated only this framework having > skipped its dependencies. Then the app might be translated very poorly > if many strings come from the dependent frameworks. > > To account for dependencies we may choose "70% of strings from the > framework + its dependencies" as the per-framework criterion for > shipping a language. > Read again what Albert said, he's not proposing to filter per framework. Aleix
_______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
